Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Re‐examining the reciprocal effects model of self‐concept, self‐efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross‐Lagged Panel and Random‐Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel frameworks

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Richard
dc.contributor.authorCrisp, Dimity
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Robert B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T23:18:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-17
dc.date.updated2021-11-28T07:28:47Z
dc.description.abstractThe cross‐lagged panel (regression) model (CLPM) is the usual framework of choice to test the longitudinal reciprocal effects between self‐concept and achievement. Criticisms of the CLPM are that causal paths are over‐estimated as they fail to discriminate between‐ and within‐person variation. The random‐intercept cross‐lagged panel model (RI‐CLPM) is one alternative that extends the CLPM by partialling out between‐person variance.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0007-0998en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/197097
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherThe British Psychological Society
dc.rights© 2019 The British Psychological Society
dc.sourceBritish Journal of Educational Psychology
dc.subjectachievement
dc.subjectCross‐Lagged Panel Model
dc.subjectRandom Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel Model
dc.subjectreciprocal effects
dc.subjectself‐concept
dc.subjectself‐efficacy
dc.titleRe‐examining the reciprocal effects model of self‐concept, self‐efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross‐Lagged Panel and Random‐Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel frameworks
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage15en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBurns, Richard, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCrisp, Dimity, University of Canberraen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBurns, Robert B, University of Sunshine Coasten_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBurns, Richard, u4009270en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor170102 - Developmental Psychology and Ageingen_AU
local.identifier.absfor170103 - Educational Psychologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920205 - Health Education and Promotionen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920599 - Specific Population Health (excl. Indigenous Health) not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo920209 - Mental Health Servicesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu1067127xPUB43en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume90
local.identifier.doi10.1111/bjep.12265en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85060220711
local.publisher.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Burns_Re%E2%80%90examining_the_reciprocal_2019.pdf
Size:
322.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

ANU Research Publications

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS