Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Re‐examining the reciprocal effects model of self‐concept, self‐efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross‐Lagged Panel and Random‐Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel frameworks

Date

2019-01-17

Authors

Burns, Richard
Crisp, Dimity
Burns, Robert B.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The British Psychological Society

Abstract

The cross‐lagged panel (regression) model (CLPM) is the usual framework of choice to test the longitudinal reciprocal effects between self‐concept and achievement. Criticisms of the CLPM are that causal paths are over‐estimated as they fail to discriminate between‐ and within‐person variation. The random‐intercept cross‐lagged panel model (RI‐CLPM) is one alternative that extends the CLPM by partialling out between‐person variance.

Description

Keywords

achievement, Cross‐Lagged Panel Model, Random Intercept Cross‐Lagged Panel Model, reciprocal effects, self‐concept, self‐efficacy

Citation

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/1885/197097

Collections

ANU Research Publications

Source

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Type

Journal article

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

10.1111/bjep.12265

Restricted until

2037-12-31

Downloads

File
Description
01_Burns_Re%E2%80%90examining_the_reciprocal_2019.pdf (322.87 KB)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS