Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Critique in Need of Critique

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Peterson, Matthew
Hollis, Aidan
Pogge, Thomas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Is it really necessary to add something like the Health Impact Fund to the existing global patent system We can divide this question into two parts. First, is there something seriously wrong with the status quo and, if so, what exactly is it Second, how do we best go about solving the problem; that is, how does the design of the reform proposal address the flaws in the status quo Jorn Sonderholm, in his critique of the Health Impact Fund, or HIF, raises both of these issues. These criticisms afford us the opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to ameliorating glaring problems with the current system for incentivizing R&D for essential medicines, and to clarify why we believe the HIF is exactly what the world needs.

Description

Citation

Source

Public Health Ethics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until