Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

C4 savanna grasses fail to maintain assimilation in drying soil under low CO2 compared with C3 trees despite lower leaf water demand

dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Joeen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBellasio, Chandraen_AU
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Daviden_AU
dc.contributor.authorBeerling, Daviden_AU
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T01:31:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-18
dc.description.abstract1) C4 photosynthesis evolved when grasses migrated out of contracting forests under a declining atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]a) and drying climate around 30 million years ago. C4 grasses are hypothesised to benefit from improved plant–water relations in open habitats like savannas, giving advantages over C3 plants under low [CO2]a. But experimental evidence in a low CO2 environment is limited and comparisons with C3 trees are needed to understand savanna vegetation patterns. 2) To test whether stomatal conductance (gS) and CO2 assimilation (A) are maintained in drier soil for C4 grasses than C3 trees, particularly under low [CO2]a, we investigated photosynthesis and plant–water relations of three C3 tree and three C4 grass species grown at 800, 400 or 200 ppm [CO2]a over moderate wetting–drying cycles. 3) C4 grasses had a lower soil–to–leaf water potential gradient than C3 trees, especially at 200 ppm [CO2]a, indicating reduced leaf water demand relative to supply. Yet the dependence of gS and A on predawn leaf water potential (a measure of soil water availability) was greater for the C4 grasses than trees, particularly under low [CO2]a. 4) Our findings establish that gS and A are not maintained in drier soil for C4 grasses compared with C3 trees, suggesting that this mechanism was not prevailing in the expansion of C4–dominated grasslands under low [CO2]a. This inherent susceptibility to sudden decreases in soil water availability justifies why C4 grasses have not evolved a resistant xylem allowing operation under drought, but instead shut down below a water potential threshold and rapidly recover. We point to this capacity to respond to transient water availability as a key overlooked driver of C4 grass success under low [CO2]a.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge funding through an ERC advanced grant (CDREG, 322998) awarded to DJB. CB acknowledges funding through a H2020 MSCA individual fellowship (DILIPHO, ID: 702755).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/154231en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherFunctional Ecologyen_AU
dc.rights"author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) after 12 months embargo for scientific, technical and medicine titles" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (Viewed 30/11/2018)en_AU
dc.source.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13240en_AU
dc.subjectC4 photosynthesis
dc.subjectelevated CO2
dc.subjectglobal change
dc.subjectgrasses
dc.subjectsavanna
dc.subjectsub–ambient CO2
dc.subjectwater limitation
dc.subjectwater relations
dc.titleC4 savanna grasses fail to maintain assimilation in drying soil under low CO2 compared with C3 trees despite lower leaf water demanden_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dc.typeDataseten_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChandra Bellasio, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Balearic islandsen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTrees and Timber Institute, Italian National Research Councilen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu1025966en_AU
local.description.notesThe data included in this manuscript is made available from the Dryad Digital Repository: doi:10.5061/dryad.64797qmen_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.13240en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2435.13240en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Quirk_et_al-2018-Functional_Ecology.pdf
Size:
308.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author/s Accepted Manuscript (AAM) / Post-print
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supporting Information 2.2.pdf
Size:
363.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting Information
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Collated_dataset_Quirk_et_al_2018_functional_ecology_JQ.xlsx
Size:
93.97 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Dataset

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: