Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Metallophilicity in annular Ru 2 M 2 derivatives of (HMB)Ru II (tpdt) versus (bis)-η 2 -dithiolate bonding in Ru 2 M derivatives of Cp*Ru III (tpdt) (HMB = η 6 -C 6 Me 6 ; Cp* = η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ; M = Cu I , Ag I,II , Au I ; tpdt = 3-thiapentane-1,5-dithiolate)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Shin, Richard
Tan, Geok Kheng
Koh, Lip
Vittal, Jagadese
Goh, Lai Yoong
Webster, Richard

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Chemical Society

Abstract

The reaction of [(HMB)RuII(η3-tpdt)] (1: HMB = η6-C6Me6; tpdt = S(CH2CH 2S-)2) with [Cu(MeCN)4]PF 6, AgPF6, and (PPh3)AuCl gave the annular species [{(HMB)RuII(μ3-η1: η1:η3-tpdt)}2(M)2] 2+ [3: M = CuI; 3A: (M)2 = CuI, CuI(MeCN); 4: M = AgI ; 6: M =

Description

Citation

Source

Organometallics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31