Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Gene action for leaf conductance in three wheat crosses

dc.contributor.authorRebetzke, G J
dc.contributor.authorCondon, Anthony G
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Robert I
dc.contributor.authorFarquhar, Graham
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:34:47Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T22:34:47Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T09:24:08Z
dc.description.abstractSelection for altered stomatal conductance has potential to improve wheat grain yields in dry and well-watered environments. Yet the slow speed with which conductance is typically measured has limited studies reporting genetic parameters for leaf conductance. A viscous air-flow porometer that measures resistance to mass flow through a leaf was used to provide rapid estimates of leaf conductance. These estimates were obtained prior to anthesis on irrigated plants representing different generations of crosses between the low conductance parent, Quarrion, and 3 high conductance varieties, Hartog, Genaro 81, and Matong. Sampling for leaf conductance was done between 08 00 and 12 00 hours under cloud-free conditions. Significant (P < 0.01) genetic differences were observed between generation means for conductance measured in different crosses and on different days. Gene action was complex with both additive and non-additive (dominance and additive-based epistasis) genetic effects important for expression of leaf conductance. There was a greater reduction in leaf conductance for Quarrion and backcross-Quarrion progeny with sampling later into the day. In turn, genetic variances for leaf conductance increased with later sampling. Family-mean heritabilities varied in size (0.06-0.70), depending on cross and time of sampling. It is suggested that breeders selecting for altered leaf conductance maximise genetic gain by delaying screening of populations until later in the day, and repeat measurements across a minimum of 2 days. Large populations of inbred families should be evaluated in order to minimise confounding through dominance and increase the probability of recovering families containing desirable non-allelic gene combinations.
dc.identifier.issn0004-9409
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/76287
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research
dc.subjectKeywords: breeding; crop yield; heritability; stomatal conductance; wheat; Triticum aestivum Breeding; Heritability; Stomatal conductance
dc.titleGene action for leaf conductance in three wheat crosses
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage387
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage381
local.contributor.affiliationRebetzke, G J, CSIRO Division of Plant Industry
local.contributor.affiliationCondon, Anthony G, CSIRO Division of Plant Industry
local.contributor.affiliationRichards, Robert I, University of Adelaide
local.contributor.affiliationFarquhar, Graham, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidFarquhar, Graham, u7601091
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor070305 - Crop and Pasture Improvement (Selection and Breeding)
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub5130
local.identifier.citationvolume54
local.identifier.doi10.1071/AR02151
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0038670450
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads