Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Gene action for leaf conductance in three wheat crosses

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Rebetzke, G J
Condon, Anthony G
Richards, Robert I
Farquhar, Graham

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Selection for altered stomatal conductance has potential to improve wheat grain yields in dry and well-watered environments. Yet the slow speed with which conductance is typically measured has limited studies reporting genetic parameters for leaf conductance. A viscous air-flow porometer that measures resistance to mass flow through a leaf was used to provide rapid estimates of leaf conductance. These estimates were obtained prior to anthesis on irrigated plants representing different generations of crosses between the low conductance parent, Quarrion, and 3 high conductance varieties, Hartog, Genaro 81, and Matong. Sampling for leaf conductance was done between 08 00 and 12 00 hours under cloud-free conditions. Significant (P < 0.01) genetic differences were observed between generation means for conductance measured in different crosses and on different days. Gene action was complex with both additive and non-additive (dominance and additive-based epistasis) genetic effects important for expression of leaf conductance. There was a greater reduction in leaf conductance for Quarrion and backcross-Quarrion progeny with sampling later into the day. In turn, genetic variances for leaf conductance increased with later sampling. Family-mean heritabilities varied in size (0.06-0.70), depending on cross and time of sampling. It is suggested that breeders selecting for altered leaf conductance maximise genetic gain by delaying screening of populations until later in the day, and repeat measurements across a minimum of 2 days. Large populations of inbred families should be evaluated in order to minimise confounding through dominance and increase the probability of recovering families containing desirable non-allelic gene combinations.

Description

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until