Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

dc.contributor.authorSun, Ling
dc.contributor.authorGoetz, Evan
dc.contributor.authorKissel, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorBetzwieser, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorKarki, Sudarshan
dc.contributor.authorViets, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorWade, Madeline
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharjee, Dripta
dc.contributor.authorBossilkov, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorCovas, P.B.
dc.contributor.authorDatrier, Laurence E. H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T00:00:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2022-08-14T08:16:09Z
dc.description.abstractThe raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be <7% in magnitude and <4 deg in phase (68% confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of <2% in magnitude and <2 deg in phase.
dc.description.sponsorshipVB and EP acknowledge the support of the ARC Center of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav), Grant Number CE170100004. PBC acknowledges the support of the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigaci´on and Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci´on y Universidades grants FPA2016- 76821-P the Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d’Innovaci´o, Recerca i Turisme del Govern de les Illes Balears (Grant FPI-CAIB FPI/2134/2018), the Fons Social Europeu 2014–2020 de les Illes Balears, the European Union FEDER funds, and the EU COST actions CA16104, CA16214, CA17137 and CA18108. The authors would like to thank all of the essential workers who put their health at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, without whom we would not have been able to complete this work. This paper carries LIGO Document Number LIGO–P1900245.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0264-9381en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/269831
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenancehttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/11260..."The Accepted Version can be archived in a Non-Commercial Institutional Repository. 12 months embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 21/07/2022).
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishing
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE170100004
dc.rights© 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceClassical and Quantum Gravity
dc.subjectgravitational waves
dc.subjectLIGO calibration
dc.subjectsystematic error
dc.subjectinterferometry
dc.subjectgeneral relativity
dc.subjectdata analysis
dc.subjectastrophysics
dc.titleCharacterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.issue22en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage45en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSun, Lilli, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGoetz, Evan, University of British Columbiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKissel, Jeffrey S., LIGO Hanford Observatoryen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBetzwieser, Joseph, LIGO Livingston Observatoryen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKarki, Sudarshan, Missouri Institute of Science and Technologyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationViets, Aaron, Concordia University Wisconsinen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWade, Madeline, Kenyon Collegeen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBhattacharjee, Dripta, Missouri Institute of Science and Technologyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBossilkov, Vladimir, University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCovas, P.B., Universitat de les Illes Balearsen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDatrier, Laurence E. H. , University of Glasgowen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidSun, Lilli, u1103112en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor510105 - General relativity and gravitational wavesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB14269en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume37en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6382/abb14een_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85092717554
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000579646400001
local.publisher.urlhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2005.02531.pdf
Size:
5.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format