Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Sun, Ling
Goetz, Evan
Kissel, Jeffrey S.
Betzwieser, Joseph
Karki, Sudarshan
Viets, Aaron
Wade, Madeline
Bhattacharjee, Dripta
Bossilkov, Vladimir
Covas, P.B.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Physics Publishing

Abstract

The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be <7% in magnitude and <4 deg in phase (68% confidence interval) in the most sensitive frequency band 20-2000 Hz. The systematic error alone is estimated at levels of <2% in magnitude and <2 deg in phase.

Description

Citation

Source

Classical and Quantum Gravity

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description