Skip navigation
Skip navigation

How gradualist are Chinese reforms? Evidence from rural income determinants

Huang, Yasheng; Qian, Meijun

Description

Gradualist reform (GR) is a strategy that implements partial and incremental reforms at the beginning but gradually deepens the reforms over time. Using income determinants in rural China as the measure of the GR hypothesis, this paper provides a direct test of the widely accepted claim that China has followed a GR strategy. In the sense that reform deepens, production factors should become more important income determinants over time. Our difference-in-difference analysis, based on a large...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yasheng
dc.contributor.authorQian, Meijun
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T01:52:40Z
dc.identifier.issn1351-847X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/114528
dc.description.abstractGradualist reform (GR) is a strategy that implements partial and incremental reforms at the beginning but gradually deepens the reforms over time. Using income determinants in rural China as the measure of the GR hypothesis, this paper provides a direct test of the widely accepted claim that China has followed a GR strategy. In the sense that reform deepens, production factors should become more important income determinants over time. Our difference-in-difference analysis, based on a large panel dataset from fixed-site rural surveys conducted between 1986 and 2002, shows that the efficiency of return to production factors deteriorated over time instead. Households that had more production resources, such as land and labor, or that devoted more labor and time to entrepreneurial activities experienced better income growth in the 1980s, but households with better political status did so in the 1990s. Further difference-in-difference analyses show that these income patterns are related to an inefficient credit allocation due to government interference in the 1990s compared to market mechanisms in the 1980s. Overall, the empirical evidence on the income determinants and on rural finance does not support the GR hypothesis on China's reform path.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.sourceThe European Journal of Finance
dc.subjectChinese reform
dc.subjectrural finance
dc.subjectincome growth
dc.subjectgradualism
dc.subjectreversal
dc.titleHow gradualist are Chinese reforms? Evidence from rural income determinants
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.issued2017-02-21
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.routledge.com/
local.type.statusAccepted Version
local.contributor.affiliationQian, M. Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, The Australian National University
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage21
local.identifier.doi10.1080/1351847X.2017.1290669
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dc.provenancehttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1351-847X/..."author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). On institutional repository or subject-based repository after a 18 months embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 18/04/17).
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Huang_How_gradualist_are_2017.pdf407.71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator