Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

How gradualist are Chinese reforms? Evidence from rural income determinants

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yasheng
dc.contributor.authorQian, Meijun
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T01:52:40Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-21
dc.description.abstractGradualist reform (GR) is a strategy that implements partial and incremental reforms at the beginning but gradually deepens the reforms over time. Using income determinants in rural China as the measure of the GR hypothesis, this paper provides a direct test of the widely accepted claim that China has followed a GR strategy. In the sense that reform deepens, production factors should become more important income determinants over time. Our difference-in-difference analysis, based on a large panel dataset from fixed-site rural surveys conducted between 1986 and 2002, shows that the efficiency of return to production factors deteriorated over time instead. Households that had more production resources, such as land and labor, or that devoted more labor and time to entrepreneurial activities experienced better income growth in the 1980s, but households with better political status did so in the 1990s. Further difference-in-difference analyses show that these income patterns are related to an inefficient credit allocation due to government interference in the 1990s compared to market mechanisms in the 1980s. Overall, the empirical evidence on the income determinants and on rural finance does not support the GR hypothesis on China's reform path.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1351-847Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/114528
dc.provenancehttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/1351-847X/..."author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing). On institutional repository or subject-based repository after a 18 months embargo" from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 18/04/17).
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_AU
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_AU
dc.sourceThe European Journal of Financeen_AU
dc.subjectChinese reformen_AU
dc.subjectrural financeen_AU
dc.subjectincome growthen_AU
dc.subjectgradualismen_AU
dc.subjectreversalen_AU
dc.titleHow gradualist are Chinese reforms? Evidence from rural income determinantsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage21en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationQian, M. Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu1007400en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1080/1351847X.2017.1290669en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.routledge.com/en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Huang_How_gradualist_are_2017.pdf
Size:
407.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: