Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

New compositional and structural data validate the status of jamborite

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bindi, L
Christy, Andrew
Mills, Stuart J.
Ciriotti, Marco E.
Bittarello, Erica

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Mineralogical Association of Canada

Abstract

Jamborite was originally described with the formula (Ni2+,Ni3+,Fe)(OH)2(OH,S,H2O) from Ca' de' Ladri and Monteacuto Ragazza near Bologna, and Castelluccio di Moscheda near Modena, Italy. Re-examination of the mineral from the type localities and Rio Vesale, Sestola, Val Panaro (Emilia-Romagna, Italy), led to the discovery of a crystal suitable for study by single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, SEM-EDS, and Raman spectroscopy. Jamborite crystallizes in the space group REmbedded Imagem, with the unit-cell parameters a 3.068(4) Å, c 23.298(11) Å, and Z = 3. The structure refinement (R1 = 0.0818) showed that jamborite contains brucite-like sheets of edge-sharing octahedra (Ni2+,M3+)(O,OH)6 with a distinctive double layer of partially occupied H2O molecules between them. Raman data indicate that the sulfur is present as sulfate rather than sulfide. The new analytical data were recalculated on the basis of 1 (Ni+Ca+Co+Fe) to give the formula [(Ni2+0.902Ca2+0.002)(Co3+0.072Fe3+0.024)]Σ1.000(OH)1.884Cl0.012(H2O)0.004(SO4)0.100·0.900H2O. The sulfur occupancy was too low to be located in the refinement, but the ≈1:1 ratio of M3+:S from the chemical analysis implies that SO42− replaces OH− in the brucite sheet rather than sitting in the interlayer space. The splitting of the H2O layer allows avoidance of short SO42−···H2O distances. Thus, jamborite is not a member of the hydrotalcite supergroup. Jamborite is redefined as M2+1−xM3+x(OH)2−x(SO4)x·nH2O, where M2+ is dominantly Ni, M3+ is dominantly Co, x ≤ 1/3 and probably ≤ 1/7 (x = 0.10 for the neotype sample), and n < (1−x). The low M3+/M2+ ratio relative to honessite and hydrohonessite and high Co content may explain the rarity of jamborite as an early alteration product of millerite. The redefinition of jamborite and designation of the neotype specimen from Rio Vesale have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC), voting proposal 14-E.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

The Canadian Mineralogist

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd