Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Sedimentary provenance of the Neoarchean Ventersdorp Supergroup, southern Africa: Shedding light on the evolution of the Kaapvaal craton during the Neoarchean

dc.contributor.authorSchneiderhan, E.
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Udo
dc.contributor.authorGutzmer, J.
dc.contributor.authorMezger, K.
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:18:54Z
dc.date.available2015-12-10T22:18:54Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:29:05Z
dc.description.abstractThe Ventersdorp Supergroup, an undeformed, subgreenschist-to-greenschist facies volcanosedimentary succession deposited on the Kaapvaal Craton between 2729 and 2665 Ma, represents an exceptional opportunity to study early cratonic evolution on Earth. Provenance studies of siliciclastic and volcaniclastic successions of the supergroup show that the Ventersdorp basin was sourced from two different regions, one that had a Mesoarchean history and another that maintained its juvenile character at the time of deposition. The volcaniclastic wackes of the Ventersdorp Supergroup's Kameeldoorns Formation are mainly composed of Mesoarchean detrital material with Nd isotope model ages (TDM) between 3.3 and 3.1 Ga and detrital zircon ages with a dominant peak between 3.0 and 3.3 Ga. Geochemical proxies (rare earth element [REE] pattern, LaN/YbN, Th/Sc, Th/U), however, yield typical post-Archean signatures. Thus, material that sourced the Kameeldoorns Formation was stored in the crust of the Kaapvaal Craton for nearly 600 m.yr. and reflects the result of crustal differentiation processes. The younger Bothaville Formation, in contrast, displays geochemical proxies similar to Archean trondhjemite-tonalite-granodiorite suites (TTGs). TDM ages are younger than those for the Kameeldoorns Formation, straddling 3.0-2.9 Ga and corresponding well with the dominant population of detrital zircons (2.9-2.8 Ga). The dominant detrital component in the Bothaville Formation thus suggests an event of crustal addition in the so-called Archean style, as Archean TTGs contain a less differentiated signature than the crustal sources of the Kameeldoorns Formation. Therefore, the crust of the Kaapvaal Craton was evidently thick enough during the Mesoarchean that long-term crustal recycling could take place. During the Neoarchean, the emplacement of Archean-style TTGs contributed to crustal thickening along the margins of the craton, which implies that Archean and post-Archean heat flow regimes existed during the Neoarchean and that their tectonomagmatic processes contributed to crustal thickening. Thus, modern plate tectonic processes could have operated earlier in the Ventersdorp Supergroup than elsewhere. It can therefore be speculated that Archean and post-Archean processes were not exclusive of one another but may have coexisted and that modern plate tectonic processes may have operated during the Archean.
dc.identifier.issn0022-1376
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/51613
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Press
dc.sourceJournal of Geology
dc.subjectKeywords: Archean; craton; crustal evolution; crustal thickening; deposition; detrital deposit; greenschist facies; plate tectonics; provenance; sediment chemistry; sediment property; siliciclastic deposit; volcaniclastic deposit; Kaapvaal Craton; Calluna vulgaris
dc.titleSedimentary provenance of the Neoarchean Ventersdorp Supergroup, southern Africa: Shedding light on the evolution of the Kaapvaal craton during the Neoarchean
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage596
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage575
local.contributor.affiliationSchneiderhan, E., Caracle Creek International Consulting
local.contributor.affiliationZimmermann, Udo, University of Stavanger
local.contributor.affiliationGutzmer, J., University of Johannesburg
local.contributor.affiliationMezger, K., University of Bern
local.contributor.affiliationArmstrong, Richard, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidArmstrong, Richard, u4029979
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor040303 - Geochronology
local.identifier.absfor040202 - Inorganic Geochemistry
local.identifier.absfor040310 - Sedimentology
local.identifier.absseo970104 - Expanding Knowledge in the Earth Sciences
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4027924xPUB228
local.identifier.citationvolume119
local.identifier.doi10.1086/661988
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-80054120431
local.identifier.thomsonID000299269700002
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads