Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates

dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Sascha
dc.contributor.authorShadbolt, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorTodd, David
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T21:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:40:58Z
dc.description.abstractBackground and study purpose: The ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM, USCOM Pty Ltd, Coffs Harbour, NSW, Australia) device provides a new method of non-invasively assessing cardiac output (CO). It has been successfully used in adults, but there have been few studies in neonates. Aims: To study the inter-operator reliability, and to compare the aortic (systemic) CO and pulmonary CO in a neonatal population. Patient and methods: In a study using the USCOM device, we have determined: (i) the inter-operator (rater) agreement for aortic (left ventricular output) and pulmonary (right ventricular output) CO; and (ii) by combining the measurements of aortic and pulmonary CO from each operator to obtain average aortic and pulmonary CO in neonates admitted to the neonatal unit during the first 8 days of life. Neonates with congenital heart disease were excluded from the study. Results: Twelve neonates were enrolled in the study, and their mean gestational age was 34.1 ± 3.7 weeks, mean birth weight 2.268 ± 0.872 kg with eight boys and four girls. There was no significant difference in CO measurements between the two operators (inter-rater correlation = 0.93 (0.86-0.97 (95% CI), P < 0.0001). However, the mean aortic CO was significantly lower than the mean pulmonary CO (228 mL/kg/min (202-254 (95% CI)) versus 282 mL/kg/min (256-309 (95% CI), P = 0.006). Conclusions: Although there was a good correlation between operators, further investigations are required to study the discrepancy between aortic (systemic)/pulmonary CO in this population. Other than this discrepancy, the validity of this technique in neonates requires further detailed studies as it uses continuous wave Doppler for the measurements.
dc.identifier.issn1034-4810
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/39384
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health
dc.subjectKeywords: article; birth weight; clinical article; correlation analysis; Doppler echography; female; gestational age; heart output; heart output measurement; hospital admission; human; interrater reliability; male; newborn; newborn assessment; portable equipment; p Cardiac output; Invasive; Neonates; Non-invasive; Pulmonary artery catheter; Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring - USCOM
dc.titleAssessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue7-8
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage468
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage464
local.contributor.affiliationMeyer, Sascha, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationShadbolt, Bruce, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTodd, David, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidMeyer, Sascha, t1184
local.contributor.authoruidShadbolt, Bruce, u1525171
local.contributor.authoruidTodd, David, a322749
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111402 - Obstetrics and Gynaecology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4201517xPUB176
local.identifier.citationvolume45
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01535.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-68749101146
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Meyer_Assessment_of_portable_2009.pdf
Size:
242.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format