Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Protecting Solar: Global Supply Chains and Business Power

dc.contributor.authorMeckling, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Llewelyn
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T03:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T10:59:24Z
dc.description.abstractGovernments invested substantially in renewable energy industries in responding to climate change, while seeking to promote economic growth. They also engaged in a series of major trade disputes, notably in the solar photovoltaic and wind sectors. The European Union (EU)– China solar dispute is one of the largest such cases. In 2013, the European Commission (EC) announced duties on imports of solar products from Chinese manufacturers. This decision was at odds with the fact that the majority of the European solar industry opposed tariffs. We propose that the decision was affected by a shift in negotiating power between business and the EC. We suggest that the rise of global supply chains undermined the structural power of industry by dividing manufacturers over trade policy and by fragmenting the information conveyed to policy-makers. This provided an opportunity to the Commission to engage in ‘interest shopping’ by selecting an industry position that matched its own interest. Evidence from a comparative case study on EU and German responses to solar imports supports our argument. The findings suggest that the globalisation of production can strengthen the negotiating power of policy-makers, and implies that policy-makers face new trade-offs at the intersection of manufacturing and climate policy.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Winkler Family Foundation, Social Science Research Council, and Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership for financial support.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1356-3467en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/247374
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherCarfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Groupen_AU
dc.rights© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_AU
dc.sourceNew Political Economyen_AU
dc.subjectBusiness-government relationsen_AU
dc.subjecttradeen_AU
dc.subjectsolar photovoltaicsen_AU
dc.subjectrenewable energyen_AU
dc.subjectclimate changeen_AU
dc.titleProtecting Solar: Global Supply Chains and Business Poweren_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMeckling, Jonas, University of Californiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHughes, Llewelyn, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidHughes, Llewelyn, u5658531en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor160507 - Environment Policyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140102 - Macroeconomic Theoryen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4326120xPUB697en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolumeOnlineen_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1080/13563467.2017.1330878en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85021124301
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.routledge.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Meckling_Protecting_Solar%3A_Global_2017.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format