Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Retention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in New Zealand

dc.contributor.authorJoshy, Grace
dc.contributor.authorLawrenson, Ross
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, D
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:20:52Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T08:51:18Z
dc.description.abstractAims: To characterise the retention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in the Waikato region of New Zealand. Methods: Retrospective review of Waikato Primary Health (WPH) registered patients who had at least one Get Checked review between 1 July 2000 and 30 Jun 2006. Results: 10,919 patients (69% Europeans, 18% Mōri, 3% Pacific Islanders, and 4% Asian) had an initial review during the 5 years of this programme. In 2005/06, only 6100 (57%) of the estimated 10,600 diabetes patients enrolled with WPH utilised the free check. Younger patients aged <40 years, those of Mōri or Asian origin, and those with Type 1 diabetes were less likely to be retained in the programme with regular checks, as indicated by their longer time to second review and lesser likelihood of return for a second or subsequent review. Conclusions: Despite the programme being fully funded, a significant proportion of patients did not return for a second review within 1.5 years after initial review. The loss of those with Type 1 diabetes and younger patients may reflect their greater contact with secondary care rather than GP services. Excess drop out among ethnic minorities need further investigation and intervention. Use of these data for policy purposes could be significantly biased unless there is a single reliable regional diabetes register based on the National Health Index number including all known patients.
dc.identifier.issn0028-8446
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/52128
dc.publisherSouthern Colour Print
dc.sourceNew Zealand Medical Journal
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; aged; controlled study; diabetes mellitus; female; funding; health care; health care financing; health care organization; health care quality; health program; health service; human; major clinical study; male; mass screening; New Zealand; patient c
dc.titleRetention of patients in the Get Checked free annual diabetes review programme in New Zealand
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1270
local.bibliographicCitation.startpageU2945
local.contributor.affiliationJoshy, Grace, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLawrenson, Ross, University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationSimmons, D, University of Auckland
local.contributor.authoruidJoshy, Grace, u5029881
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111711 - Health Information Systems (incl. Surveillance)
local.identifier.absseo920205 - Health Education and Promotion
local.identifier.absseo920104 - Diabetes
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4468094xPUB239
local.identifier.citationvolume121
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-42149130440
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Joshy_Retention_of_patients_in_the_2008.pdf
Size:
2.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd