Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Changing contributions of different agricultural policy instruments to global reductions in trade and welfare

dc.contributor.authorCroser, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kym
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T23:47:16Z
dc.date.available2015-02-02T23:47:16Z
dc.date.created2011-07en_AU
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2020-12-20T07:21:55Z
dc.description.abstractTrade negotiators and policy advisors are keen to know the relative contributions of different farm policy instruments to international trade and economic welfare. Nominal rates of assistance or producer support estimates are incomplete indicators, especially when (as in many developing countries) some commodities are taxed and others are subsidized, in which case positive contributions can offset negative contributions. This paper develops and estimates a new set of more-satisfactory partial equilibrium indicators of the relative contribution of different farm policy instruments to reductions in agricultural trade and welfare. It does so by drawing on the trade restrictiveness index literature and a recently compiled database on distortions to agricultural prices for 75 developing and high-income countries over the period 1960 to 2004. Results confirm earlier findings that border taxes are the dominant instrument affecting global trade and welfare, but they also suggest declines in export taxes contributed nearly as much as cuts in import protection to the trade and welfare effects of agricultural policy reforms since the 1980s.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful for funding from World Bank Trust Funds provided by the governments of the Netherlands (BNPP), the United Kingdom (DfID) and Ireland, as well as from the Australian Research Council.en_AU
dc.format.extent27 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1474-7456en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/12585
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.rights© Cambridge University Press 2015
dc.sourceWorld Trade Review 10. 3 (2011): 297-323
dc.subjectpartial equilibrium indicators
dc.subjectfarm policy instruments
dc.subjectagricultural trade and welfare
dc.subjectborder taxes
dc.subjectglobal trade and welfare
dc.titleChanging contributions of different agricultural policy instruments to global reductions in trade and welfare
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage323
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage297
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Kym, Arndt-Corden Dept of Economics, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu4042848en_AU
local.description.embargoFunding information: The authors are grateful for funding from World Bank Trust Funds provided by the governments of the Netherlands (BNPP), the United Kingdom (DfID) and Ireland, as well as from the Australian Research Council.
local.identifier.absfor140201 - Agricultural Economics
local.identifier.absseo910205 - Industry Policy
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB2896
local.identifier.citationvolume10
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S1474745611000176
local.identifier.essn1475-3138en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79960285315
local.identifier.thomsonID000292116700001
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.cambridge.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished versionen_AU

Downloads

abcd