Rationalizing Discursive Anomalies
Abstract
Sunstein's�Infotopia�offers four reasons for thinking that information-pooling via mechanical aggregation of votes is superior to discursive sharing of opinions. This article focuses on two of them�the Common Knowledge Effect and Group Polarisation�showing that both phenomena might have perfectly good Bayesian explanations. Far from constituting 'errors', both can actually contribute to truth-tracking in ways that cannot be accomplished via mechanical aggregation of votes alone.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description