What Mary Did Yesterday: Reflections on Knowledge-wh
dc.contributor.author | Brogaard, Berit | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-07T22:15:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-12-07T07:40:58Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Reductionists about knowledge-wh hold that "s knows-wh" (e.g. "John knows who stole his car") is reducible to "there is a proposition p such that s knows that p, and p answers the indirect question of the wh-clause." Anti-reductionists hold that "s knows-wh" is reducible to "s knows that p, as the true answer to the indirect question of the wh-clause." I argue that both of these positions are defective. I then offer a new analysis of knowledge-wh as a special kind of de re knowledge. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8205 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/17741 | |
dc.publisher | Philosophy Phenomeological Research | |
dc.source | Philosophy and Phenomenological Research | |
dc.title | What Mary Did Yesterday: Reflections on Knowledge-wh | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 2 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 467 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 439 | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Brogaard, Berit, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU | |
local.contributor.authoremail | repository.admin@anu.edu.au | |
local.contributor.authoruid | Brogaard, Berit, u4466227 | |
local.description.embargo | 2037-12-31 | |
local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
local.identifier.absfor | 220304 - Epistemology | |
local.identifier.ariespublication | u4583819xPUB2 | |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 78 | |
local.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00250.x | |
local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-61449209120 | |
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBy | u4583819 | |
local.type.status | Published Version |
Downloads
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- 01_Brogaard_What_Mary_Did_Yesterday:_2009.pdf
- Size:
- 160.36 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format