Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Is biodiversity management effective? Cross-sectional relationships between management, bird response and vegetation attributes in an Australian agri-environment scheme

Date

Authors

Wood, Jeffrey

Montague-Drake, Rebecca

Michael, Damian

Crane, Mason

Okada, Sachiko

MacGregor, Chris

Gibbons, Philip

Lindenmayer, David B

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Do sites managed under an agri-environment scheme support significantly more biodiversity than sites managed in accordance with traditional agricultural practices? This is a key question underpinning agri-environment schemes worldwide, including one that

Keywords

Keywords: agricultural land; agricultural practice; agricultural production; biodiversity; bird; cross section; functional group; grazing pressure; habitat conservation; management practice; native species; overstory; physiological response; shrub; species richness Agricultural landscapes; Bird conservation; Management intervention; Reduced grazing pressure; Temperate woodland; Vegetation condition

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/1885/64878

Collections

ANU Research Publications

Source

Biological Conservation

Type

Journal article

Access Statement

Open Access

DOI

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.026

Downloads

File

Description

Is biodiversity management effective accepted MS.pdf (1.61 MB)

Author/s Accepted Manuscript (AAM) / Post-print

abcd