Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Chlorinated Drinking water and micronuclei in urinary bladder epithelial cells

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Ranmuthugala, Geethanjali
Pilotto, Louis
Smith, Wayne
Vimalasiri, Titus
Dear, Keith
Douglas, Robert M

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Abstract

Background: Evidence for a causal relationship between disinfection byproducts in chlorinated water and cancer is not conclusive. This study investigates the association between disinfection byproducts in chlorinated water, as measured by trihalomethane concentration, and the frequency of micronuclei in urinary bladder epithelial cells, thereby assessing the carcinogenic potential of disinfection byproducts. Methods: A cohort study was undertaken in 1997 in 3 Australian communities with varying levels of disinfection byproducts in the water supply. Exposure was assessed using both available dose (total trihalomethane concentration in the water supply) and intake dose (calculated by adjusting for individual variations in ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption). Micronuclei in urinary bladder epithelial cells were used as a preclinical biomarker of genotoxicity. Results: Cells were scored for micronuclei for 228 participants, of whom 63% were exposed to disinfection by products and 37% were unexposed. Available dose of total trihalomethane for the exposed group ranged from 38 to 157 μg/L, whereas intake dose ranged from 3 to 469 μg/kg per day. Relative risk for DNA damage to bladder cells, per 10 μg/L of available dose total trihalomethane, was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-1.06) for smokers and 0.996 (CI = 0.961-1.032) for nonsmokers. Relative risk, per 10 μg/kg per day of intake dose of total trihalomethane, was 0.99 (CI = 0.96-1.03) for smokers and 1.003 (CI = 0.984-1.023) for nonsmokers. Conclusion: This study provides no evidence that trihalomethane concentrations, at the levels we investigated, are associated with DNA damage to bladder cells.

Description

Citation

Source

Epidemiology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until