Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

How an outbreak became a pandemic: a chronological analysis of crucial junctures and international obligations in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sudhvir
dc.contributor.authorMcNab, Christine
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Rose McKeon
dc.contributor.authorBristol, Nellie
dc.contributor.authorNolan, Cody
dc.contributor.authorMabuchi, Shunsuke
dc.contributor.authorBartos, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPanjabi, Raj
dc.contributor.authorKaran, Abrar
dc.contributor.authorAbdalla, Salma M
dc.contributor.authorBonk, Mathias
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-08T04:51:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-02-13T07:17:47Z
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the spread of SARS-CoV-2, how and when evidence emerged, and the timing of local, national, regional, and global responses is essential to establish how an outbreak became a pandemic and to prepare for future health threats. With that aim, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response has developed a chronology of events, actions, and recommendations, from December, 2019, when the first cases of COVID-19 were identified in China, to the end of March, 2020, by which time the outbreak had spread extensively worldwide and had been characterised as a pandemic. Datapoints are based on two literature reviews, WHO documents and correspondence, submissions to the Panel, and an expert verification process. The retrospective analysis of the chronology shows a dedicated initial response by WHO and some national governments, but also aspects of the response that could have been quicker, including outbreak notifications under the International Health Regulations (IHR), presumption and confirmation of human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and, most importantly, the public health response of many national governments. The chronology also shows that some countries, largely those with previous experience with similar outbreaks, reacted quickly, even ahead of WHO alerts, and were more successful in initially containing the virus. Mapping actions against IHR obligations, the chronology shows where efficiency and accountability could be improved at local, national, and international levels to more quickly alert and contain health threats in the future. In particular, these improvements include necessary reforms to international law and governance for pandemic preparedness and response, including the IHR and a potential framework convention on pandemic preparedness and response.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1474-547Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/289923
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherThe Lancet Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier Ltden_AU
dc.sourceThe Lanceten_AU
dc.titleHow an outbreak became a pandemic: a chronological analysis of crucial junctures and international obligations in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemicen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue10316en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2124en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage2109en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSingh, Sudhvir, University of Aucklanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMcNab, Christine, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Responseen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationOlson, Rose McKeon, Harvard Medical Schoolen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBristol, Nellie, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Responseen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNolan, Cody, Harvard Medical Schoolen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMabuchi, Shunsuke, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Responseen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBartos, Michael, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPanjabi, Raj, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Responseen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKaran, Abrar, Harvard Medical Schoolen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAbdalla, Salma M, Boston Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBonk, Mathias, Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Responseen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBartos, Michael, u1497926en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor440706 - Health policyen_AU
local.identifier.absfor480412 - Medical and health lawen_AU
local.identifier.absseo200303 - Health surveillanceen_AU
local.identifier.absseo200406 - Health protection and disaster responseen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB24981en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume398en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01897-3en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.elsevier.com/en-auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads