Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Coordinated Charge and Discharge Scheduling of Electric Vehicles for Load Curve Shaping

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Nimalsiri, Nanduni
Ratnam, Elizabeth
Smith, David
Mediwaththe, Chathurika
Halgamuge, Saman

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE Inc)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose two decentralized Electric Vehicle (EV) charge scheduling schemes for shaping the load curve of residential communities connected to the electric grid. The first scheme is designed for Coordinated Valley-Filling (C-VF) of the load curve via only EV charging. The second scheme is designed for Coordinated Valley-Filling and Peak-Shaving (C-VF-PS) of the load curve via both EV charging and discharging. In both schemes, a set of grid-connected EVs referred to as an `EV Group' (EVG) coordinates their charge (and discharge) schedules by means of an iterative routine. Specifically, at each iteration of the respective routine, each EV in the EVG updates its charge (and discharge) schedule using a water-filling based algorithm that is specifically tailored for load curve shaping. To accommodate heterogeneous EV arrival times, which are often non-deterministic, each of C-VF and C-VF-PS is implemented in two methods, which differ in the way the EVG is formed. The first method requires all the grid-connected EVs to reschedule at designated time intervals, whereas the second method requires each EV to schedule only once, yielding lower computation and communication overheads. Numerical simulation results confirm that, compared to uncoordinated EV charging, C-VF and C-VF-PS reduce the load variance (flattens the load curve) by 47% and 65%, respectively. Furthermore, Method 2 is shown to be more effective than Method 1, in terms of computation and communication overheads.

Description

Citation

Source

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12
abcd