Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Testing single-sample estimators of effective population size in genetically structured populations

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Holleley, Clare E.
Nichols, Richard A.
Whitehead, Michael
Adamack, Aaron T.
Gunn, Melissa R.
Sherwin, William

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Abstract

The effective population size (N e) is a key parameter in evolutionary and population genetics. Single-sample N e estimation provides an alternative to traditional approaches requiring two or more samples. Single-sample methods assume that the study population has no genetic sub-structure, which is unlikely to be true in wild populations. Here we empirically investigated two single-sample estimators (onesamp and L d N e) in replicated and controlled genetically structured populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Using experimentally controlled population parameters, we calculated the Wright-Fisher expected N e for the structured population (Total N e) and demonstrated that the loss of heterozygosity did not significantly differ from Wright's model. We found that disregarding the population substructure resulted in Total N e estimates with a low coefficient of variation but these estimates were systematically lower than the expected values, whereas hierarchical estimates accounting for population structure were closer to the expected values but had a higher coefficient of variation. Analysis of simulated populations demonstrated that incomplete sampling, initial allelic diversity and balancing selection may have contributed to deviations from the Wright-Fisher model. Overall the approximate-Bayesian onesamp method performed better than L d N e (with appropriate priors). Both methods performed best when dispersal rates were high and the population structure was approaching panmixia.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Conservation Genetics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31