Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction

dc.contributor.authorSakoda, Kazuma
dc.contributor.authorYamori, Wataru
dc.contributor.authorGroszmann, Michael
dc.contributor.authorEvans, John
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T21:52:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-30
dc.description.abstractThe dynamics of leaf photosynthesis in fluctuating light affects carbon gain by plants. Mesophyll conductance (gm) limits CO2 assimilation rate (A) under the steady state, but the extent of this limitation under non-steady state conditions is unknown. In the present study, we aimed to characterize the dynamics of gm and the limitations to A imposed by gas diffusional and biochemical processes under fluctuating light. The induction responses of A, stomatal conductance (gs), gm, and the maximum rate of RuBP carboxylation (Vcmax) or electron transport (J) were investigated in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana (L.)) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). We first characterized gm induction after a change from darkness to light. Each limitation to A imposed by gm, gs and Vcmax, or J was significant during induction, indicating that gas diffusional and biochemical processes limit photosynthesis. Initially, gs imposed the greatest limitation to A, showing the slowest response under high light after long and short periods of darkness, assuming RuBP-carboxylation limitation. However, if RuBP-regeneration limitation was assumed, then J imposed the greatest limitation. gm did not vary much following short interruptions to light. The limitation to A imposed by gm was the smallest of all the limitations for most of the induction phase. This suggests that altering induction kinetics of mesophyll conductance would have little impact on A following a change in light. To enhance the carbon gain by plants under naturally dynamic light environments, attention should therefore be focused on faster stomatal opening or activation of electron transport.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by KAKENHI to W.Y. (Grant Number: 16H06552, 18H02185, 18KK0170 and 20H05687) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Research Fellow to K.S. from JSPS (20J00594), and the Center of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis to J.E. (Grant Number: CE140100015) from the Australian Research Council.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0032-0889en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/224415
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherOxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologistsen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100015en_AU
dc.rights© 2020 The Author(s)en_AU
dc.sourcePlant Physiologyen_AU
dc.titleStomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during inductionen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access via publisher siteen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-22
local.contributor.affiliationSakoda, Kazuma, University of Tokyoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationYamori, Wataru, University of Tokyoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGroszmann, Michael, Division of Plant Science, Research School of Biology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEvans, John R., Division of Plant Science, Research School of Biology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGroszmann, Michael, u1004439en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidEvans, John R., u8802050en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB17730
local.identifier.doi10.1093/plphys/kiaa011en_AU
local.identifier.essn1532-2548en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
kiaa011.pdf
Size:
2.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: