Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Policy review of water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia: the "do's" and "do'nots"

dc.contributor.authorGrafton, Quentin
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-27T00:25:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T07:44:56Z
dc.description.abstractThe water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1364-985Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/202482
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.rights© 2019 The Authoren_AU
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economicsen_AU
dc.titlePolicy review of water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia: the "do's" and "do'nots"en_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage141en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage116en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGrafton, R Quentin, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGrafton, R Quentin, u4038333en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140201 - Agricultural Economicsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3102795xPUB577en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume63en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-8489.12288en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85059454009
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.wiley.com/en-gben_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Grafton_Policy_review_of_water_reform_2019.pdf
Size:
333.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format