The Pandemic Paradox in International Law
Date
Authors
Danchin, Peter
Farrall, Jeremy
Rana, Shruti
Saunders, Imogen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Society of International Law
Abstract
This Essay examines a series of paradoxes that have rendered the international legal order’s
mechanisms for collective action powerless precisely when they are needed most to fight COVID19. The“patriotism paradox”is that disengagement from the international legal order weakens
rather than strengthens state sovereignty. The “border paradox” is that securing domestic populations by excluding noncitizens, in the absence of accompanying regulatory mechanisms to
secure adherence to internal health measures, accelerates viral spread among citizens. The
“equality paradox” is that while pandemics pose an equal threat to all people, their impacts
compound existing inequalities.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
American Journal of International Law
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description