Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Pandemic Paradox in International Law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Danchin, Peter
Farrall, Jeremy
Rana, Shruti
Saunders, Imogen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Society of International Law

Abstract

This Essay examines a series of paradoxes that have rendered the international legal order’s mechanisms for collective action powerless precisely when they are needed most to fight COVID19. The“patriotism paradox”is that disengagement from the international legal order weakens rather than strengthens state sovereignty. The “border paradox” is that securing domestic populations by excluding noncitizens, in the absence of accompanying regulatory mechanisms to secure adherence to internal health measures, accelerates viral spread among citizens. The “equality paradox” is that while pandemics pose an equal threat to all people, their impacts compound existing inequalities.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

American Journal of International Law

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until