Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Squatting, lunging and kneeling provided similar kinematic profiles in healthy knees - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on deep knee flexion kinematics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Galvin, C.R.
Perriman, Diana
Newman, Phil
Lynch, Joseph T
Smith, Paul
Scarvell, Jennie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Background: Understanding healthy deep flexion kinematics will inform the design of conservative clinical rehabilitation strategies for knee osteoarthritis and contribute to improved knee prosthesis design. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the kinematic outcomes measured at the healthy tibiofemoral joint during loaded deep knee flexion. Methods: A computerised literature search and bibliography review without date restriction identified twelve studies with 164 participants aged 25–61 years in-vivo, and 69–93 years in-vitro. Flexion higher than 120° was achieved by squatting, lunging or kneeling. Measurement technologies in-vivo included radiographs, open MRI and 2D–3D MRI or CT image registration on fluoroscopy. Microscribe was used in-vitro. Results: Outcomes were either six degrees-of-freedom based on femur movement or contact patterns on the tibial plateau. The meta-analysis demonstrated that in-vivo, between 120° and 135° of flexion, the tibia internally rotated (mean difference (MD) = 4.6°, 95% CI 3.55° to 5.64°). Both the medial-femoral-condyle and lateral-femoral-condyle translated posteriorly, (MD = 10.4 mm, 95% CI 6.9 to 13.9 mm) and (MD = 5.55 mm, 95% CI 4.64 to 6.46 mm) respectively. There was some evidence of femoral medial translation (3.8 mm) and adduction (1.9° to 3.3°), together with medial compression (1.7 mm) and lateral distraction (1.9) mm. Conclusions: Across the in-vivo studies, consistent kinematic patterns emerged; despite the various measurement technologies and reference methods. In contrast, in-vivo and in-vitro results were contradictory. Trial registration: This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 25 February 2017 (registration number: 42017057614).

Description

Citation

Source

The Knee

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31