Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations in savanna trees and C₄ grasses grown at low, ambient and high atmospheric CO₂

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bellasio, Chandra
Quirk, Joe
Beerling, David J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

By the end of the century, atmospheric CO₂ concentration ([CO₂]a) could reach 800 ppm, having risen from ~200 ppm ~24 Myr ago. Carbon dioxide enters plant leaves through stomata that limit CO₂ diffusion and assimilation, imposing stomatal limitation (LS). Other factors limiting assimilation are collectively called non-stomatal limitations (LNS). C₄ photosynthesis concentrates CO₂ around Rubisco, typically reducing LS. C₄-dominated savanna grasslands expanded under low [CO₂]a and are metastable ecosystems where the response of trees and C₄ grasses to rising [CO2]a will determine shifting vegetation patterns. How LS and LNS differ between savanna trees and C₄ grasses under different [CO₂]a will govern the responses of CO₂ fixation and plant cover to [CO₂]a – but quantitative comparisons are lacking. We measured assimilation, within soil wetting–drying cycles, of three C₃ trees and three C₄ grasses grown at 200, 400 or 800 ppm [CO₂]a. Using assimilation–response curves, we resolved LS and LNS and show that rising [CO₂]a alleviated LS, particularly for the C₃ trees, but LNS was unaffected and remained substantially higher for the grasses across all [CO₂]a treatments. Because LNS incurs higher metabolic costs and recovery compared with LS, our findings indicate that C₄ grasses will be comparatively disadvantaged as [CO₂]a rises.

Description

Citation

Source

Plant Science

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description