Extending vegetation site data and ensemble models to predict patterns of foliage cover and species richness for plant functional groups

dc.contributor.authorMcNellie, Megan J.
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Ian
dc.contributor.authorFerrier, Simon
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Graeme
dc.contributor.authorManion, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorGriffioen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Matt D
dc.contributor.authorKoen, Terry
dc.contributor.authorSomerville, M
dc.contributor.authorGibbons, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T23:15:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-03T23:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-08-01T08:25:15Z
dc.description.abstractContext: Ensembles of artificial neural network models can be trained to predict the continuous characteristics of vegetation such as the foliage cover and species richness of different plant functional groups. Objectives: Our first objective was to synthesise existing site-based observations of native plant species to quantify summed percentage foliage cover and species richness within four functional groups and in totality. Secondly, we generated spatially-explicit, continuous, landscape-scale models of these functional groups, accompanied by maps of the model residuals to show uncertainty. Methods: Using a case study from New South Wales, Australia, we aggregated floristic observations from 6806 sites into four common plant growth forms (trees, shrubs, grasses and forbs) representing four different functional groups. We coupled these response data with spatially-complete surfaces describing environmental predictors and predictors that reflect landscape-scale disturbance. We predicted the distribution of foliage cover and species richness of these four plant functional groups over 1.5 million hectares. Importantly, we display spatially explicit model residuals so that end-users have a tangible and transparent means of assessing model uncertainty. Results: Models of richness generally performed well (R2 0.43–0.63), whereas models of cover were more variable (R2 0.12–0.69). RMSD ranged from 1.42 (tree richness) to 29.86 (total native cover). MAE ranged from 1.0 (tree richness) to 20.73 (total native foliage cover). Conclusions: Continuous maps of vegetation attributes can add considerable value to existing maps and models of discrete vegetation classes and provide ecologically informative data to support better decisions across multiple spatial scales.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/270164
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_AU
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_AU
dc.rights© Crown 2021en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceLandscape Ecologyen_AU
dc.subjectGrowth formen_AU
dc.subjectResidual erroren_AU
dc.subjectEnsembleen_AU
dc.subjectNeural networken_AU
dc.subjectPredictive modellingen_AU
dc.subjectSite-based floristic recordsen_AU
dc.subjectSpatially-explicit vegetation modelsen_AU
dc.subjectVegetation richnessen_AU
dc.subjectVegetation coveren_AU
dc.titleExtending vegetation site data and ensemble models to predict patterns of foliage cover and species richness for plant functional groupsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1407en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1391en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMcNellie, Megan, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationOliver, Ian, Department of Planning, Industry and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFerrier, Simon, CSIRO Land and Wateren_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNewell, Graeme, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Researchen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationManion, Glenn, Department of Planning, Industry and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGriffioen, Peter, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Researchen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWhite, Matt D, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Researchen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKoen, Terry, Department of Planning, Industry and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSomerville, M, Department of Planning, Industry and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGibbons, Philip, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidMcNellie, Megan, u5084785en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGibbons, Philip, u9205067en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor000000 - Internal ANU use onlyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB18145en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume36en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-021-01221-xen_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85102499797
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Extending vegetation site data and ensemble models.pdf
Size:
7.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: