Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Intermediaries in environmental offset markets: Actions and incentives

dc.contributor.authorCoggan, Anthea
dc.contributor.authorBuitelaar, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorWhitten, Stuart M
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:35:03Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:54:04Z
dc.description.abstractTransaction cost theory and application tells us that when buyers and sellers in a market incur transaction costs, intermediaries may become involved. Specifically, intermediaries influence the cause of the transaction costs to buyers and sellers such that transaction costs are reduced. In this paper we assess if and how this occurs for a number of case study government created and private emergent intermediaries in Australian environmental offset markets. We find that the causes of transaction costs to buyers and sellers in offset markets - asset specificity, uncertainty and transaction frequency are influenced downwards by intermediaries. The degree of influence depends on the nature of the good traded in the offset market. We also assessed if the public intermediaries studied were operating in the offset markets to reduce the incidence of probity hazard (poor transactions) from private intermediaries. We found that this was not the case.
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/69686
dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.sourceLand Use Policy
dc.subjectKeywords: environmental economics; environmental policy; governance approach; land market; transaction cost; Australia Environmental policy; Intermediaries; Offsets; Transaction costs
dc.titleIntermediaries in environmental offset markets: Actions and incentives
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage154
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage145
local.contributor.affiliationCoggan, Anthea, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBuitelaar, Edwin, University of Amsterdam
local.contributor.affiliationWhitten, Stuart M, CSIRO
local.contributor.affiliationBennett, Jeffrey, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidCoggan, Anthea, u3975202
local.contributor.authoruidBennett, Jeffrey, u9907243
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor140205 - Environment and Resource Economics
local.identifier.absseo960699 - Environmental and Natural Resource Evaluation not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB2093
local.identifier.citationvolume32
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.002
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84870487502
local.identifier.thomsonID000315426600015
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Coggan_Intermediaries_in_2013.pdf
Size:
642.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format