Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

PELICAN: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices to assess a self-management support intervention based on individual goals for children with asthma.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

van Bragt, Stephanie
van den Bemt, Lisette
Kievits, Regien
Merkus, Peter
Schermer, Tjard R.J.
van Weel, Chris

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Marcel Dekker Inc.

Abstract

Objective: Insufficient asthma management leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study is to assess whether individualized self-management (ISM) support will improve HRQL in children with asthma compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) in Dutch general practices. Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. ISM is a nurse-led intervention that is optimized to the needs of children, leading to a written action plan. Power calculation demanded inclusion of 170 children (aged 6-11years) diagnosed with asthma and active medication use. Results: Outcomes were HRQL of the child (Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, PAQLQ-s) and several secondary outcomes. Data of 29 children (mean age 8.6years, SD 1.7) were analyzed; ISM (n=15) or EUC (n=14). Logistic regression analysis (minimal clinical important difference; MCID≥0.5) and descriptive analyses were performed. Despite high PAQLQ-s score at baseline (median ISM 6.35, EUC 6.02), a substantial number of subjects from both groups showed MCID of HRQL (ISM 33%, EUC 57%). Treatment differences on HRQL were not significant (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.08, 1.69). Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences either, with exception of PAQLQ-s symptoms domain score in favor of EUC. Conclusion: Due to recruitment problems and underpowered analyses, no firm conclusions on the effectiveness of ISM support for childhood asthma in primary care could be drawn. Still, this study can be considered a valuable pilot study and in the future, there might be better capacity in general practices to commit to such treatment.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Asthma

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31