Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Geographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamates

dc.contributor.authorTingley, Reid
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Stewart L.
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorWoinarski, John C.Z.
dc.contributor.authorMeiri, Shai
dc.contributor.authorBowles, Philip
dc.contributor.authorCox, Neil
dc.contributor.authorShea, Glenn M.
dc.contributor.authorBohm, Monika
dc.contributor.authorChanson, Janice
dc.contributor.authorTognelli, Marcelo F.
dc.contributor.authorMoritz, Craig
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T04:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-10
dc.date.updated2020-03-08T07:22:21Z
dc.description.abstractAustralia is a global hotspot of reptile diversity, hosting ~10% of the world's squamate (snake and lizard) species. Yet the conservation status of the Australian squamate fauna has not been assessed for >25 years; a period during which the described fauna has risen by ~40%. Here we provide the first comprehensive conservation assessment of Australian terrestrial squamates using IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Most (86.4%; n = 819/948) Australian squamates were categorised as Least Concern, 4.5% were Data Deficient, and 7.1% (range 6.8%–11.3%, depending on the treatment of Data Deficient species) were threatened (3.0% Vulnerable, 2.7% Endangered, 1.1% Critically Endangered). This level of threat is low relative to the global average (~18%). One species (Emoia nativitatis) was assessed as Extinct, and two species (Lepidodactylus listeri and Cryptoblepharus egeriae) are considered Extinct in the Wild: all three were endemic to Christmas Island. Most (75.1%) threat assessments were based on geographic range attributes, due to limited data on population trends or relevant proxies. Agriculture, fire, and invasive species were the threats that affected the most species, and there was substantial geographic variation in the number of species affected by each threat. Threatened species richness peaked on islands, in the Southern Alps, and across northern Australia. Data deficiency was greatest in northern Australia and in coastal Queensland. Approximately one-in-five threatened species were not represented in a single protected area. Our analyses shed light on the species, regions, and threats in most urgent need of conservation intervention.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/216154
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rights©2019 Elsevier Ltd.en_AU
dc.sourceBiological Conservationen_AU
dc.subjectAssessmenten_AU
dc.subjectConservation statusen_AU
dc.subjectExtinction risken_AU
dc.subjectIUCNen_AU
dc.subjectReptilesen_AU
dc.subjectThreat statusen_AU
dc.titleGeographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamatesen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-05
local.contributor.affiliationTingley, Reid, Monash Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMacdonald, Stewart L., CSIRO Land and Water Flagshipen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMitchell, Nicola, University of Western Australiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWoinarski, John C.Z., Charles Darwin Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMeiri, Shai, Tel Aviv Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBowles, Philip, Conservation Internationalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCox, Neil, Conservation Internationalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationShea, Glenn M., University of Sydneyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBohm, Monika, Zoological Society of Londonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChanson, Janice, International Union for Conservation (IUCN)en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTognelli, Marcelo F., International Union for Conservation of Nature and Conservation Internationalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMoritz, Craig, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidMoritz, Craig, u1572787en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversityen_AU
local.identifier.absfor060809 - Vertebrate Biologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo960805 - Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scalesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5786633xPUB1023en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume238en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108203en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85070258187
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biological-conservationen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Tingley_Geographic_and_taxonomic_2019.pdf
Size:
1.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd