Colonial rule, decolonisation, and corruption in India

dc.contributor.authorKenny, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:10:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T07:32:22Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper posits that the varied legacies of colonial rule and decolonisation can explain interstate variation in the institutionalisation of corruption in post-independence India. It concludes that the relative freedom from state capture after independence depended on two conditions: (1) the institutionalisation of bureaucratic autonomy prior to independence and (2) the survival of the disruption of decolonisation by an autonomous bureaucracy to be utilised by new representative governments following independence. These conditions were generally not met across India with the exception of the southern state of Kerala.
dc.identifier.issn1466-2043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/29327
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
dc.sourceCommonwealth and Comparative Politics
dc.titleColonial rule, decolonisation, and corruption in India
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage427
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage401
local.contributor.affiliationKenny, Paul, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.authoremailu5337377@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidKenny, Paul, u5337377
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor160606 - Government and Politics of Asia and the Pacific
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5011857xPUB64
local.identifier.citationvolume53
local.identifier.doi10.1080/14662043.2015.1089002
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84944677435
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByu5011857
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Kenny_Colonial_rule,_decolonisation,_2015.pdf
Size:
594.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format