Culture clash? Recovery in mental health under Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme - a case study
Date
2019
Authors
Rosenberg, Sebastian
Redmond, Chris
Boyer, Pam
Gleeson, Prue
Russell, Paul
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sax Institute
Abstract
Objective: Using a case study, we aim to report on the compatibility of
funding and policy settings under Australia’s National Disability Insurance
Scheme (NDIS) with the delivery of evidence based, recovery-oriented
psychosocial services.
Type of program or service: We refect on the impact of the NDIS on a
psychosocial rehabilitation service run by Woden Community Service (WCS),
one of the major service providers in the Australian Capital Territory, and
specifcally its Transition to Recovery (TRec) program.
Methods: We examine NDIS funding and policy settings and consider the
recovery-oriented practices underpinning psychosocial programs like TRec.
The construct of the program, its staffng and related issues are considered.
The article draws on a formal evaluation of TRec conducted in 2015.
Results: The NDIS is having a seismic impact on Australia’s psychosocial
sector. Despite its positive evaluation, the future of the TRec program is
problematic. Practically, service exit points have disappeared, reducing
the program’s capacity to properly transition clients between services and
effectively increasing the likelihood of relapse. More generally, current NDIS
policies are threatening the fdelity of WCS’s approach to recovery practice.
Lessons learnt: This case study highlights tension between a new public
insurance scheme primarily aimed at better managing consistent conditions
and circumstances, and the recovery philosophy which has emerged in
relation to episodic mental illness. This has implications for psychosocial
services nationwide. The psychosocial rehabilitation sector has always been a
peripheral element of Australia’s mental health service mix. The advent of the
NDIS offers hope that this may change. However, WCS’s experience suggests
that the NDIS must reconsider how best to foster recovery-oriented practice in
mental health. This should be part of a more fundamental reconceptualisation
of the role of psychosocial rehabilitation services in contemporary mental health care, not just for NDIS recipients. This work is urgent if Australia is to
nurture its already rare psychosocial rehabilitation workforce and not see it
dissipate.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Public Health Research & Practice
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence