Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Two steps forward, two steps back: the mobilisation of customary land Papua New Guinea

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Filer, Colin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Crawford School of Public Policy

Abstract

In May 2019, the Minister for Lands convened a National Land Summit in Port Moresby to review the implementation of the National Land Development Program over the course of the past decade. Much of the discussion at this meeting was concerned with the incorporation of customary land groups and the voluntary registration of their collective land titles under legislation that was passed by the National Parliament in 2009 but did not take effect until 2012. Participants in the summit thought that the implementation of this legislation had not proven to be an effective way of ‘mobilising customary land for development’. This paper seeks to explain why the new legal and institutional regime has failed to live up to the expectations of the policymakers who were instrumental in its establishment. An initial examination of the rationale behind the legislation is followed by an examination of published evidence relating to its implementation in different parts of the country, including case studies of areas where the evidence serves to illuminate the motivations of the actors involved in the process of incorporati on and registration. The paper concludes with some reflections on the lessons to be learnt from this experiment in policy reform. Discussion Paper 86 December 2019 Series ISSN 2206303X

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

DOI

Restricted until

abcd