Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Phylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity

dc.contributor.authorDavies, T. Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorFritz, Susanne A.
dc.contributor.authorGrenyer, Richard
dc.contributor.authorOrme, C. David L.
dc.contributor.authorBielby, Jon
dc.contributor.authorBininda-Emonds, Olaf R.P.
dc.contributor.authorCardillo, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorJones, Kate E.
dc.contributor.authorGittleman, John L.
dc.contributor.authorMace, Georgina M.
dc.contributor.authorPurvis, Andy
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T10:34:56Z
dc.description.abstractPhylogenies describe the origins and history of species. However, they can also help to predict species' fates and so can be useful tools for managing the future of biodiversity. This article starts by sketching how phylogenetic, geographic, and trait information can be combined to elucidate present mammalian diversity patterns and how they arose. Recent diversification rates and standing diversity show different geographic patterns, indicating that cradles of diversity have moved over time. Patterns in extinction risk reflect both biological differences among mammalian lineages and differences in threat intensity among regions. Phylogenetic comparative analyses indicate that for small-bodied mammals, extinction risk is governed mostly by where the species live and the intensity of the threats, whereas for large-bodied mammals, ecological differences also play an important role. This modeling approach identifies species whose intrinsic biology renders them particularly vulnerable to increased human pressure. We outline how the approach might be extended to consider future trends in anthropogenic drivers, to identify likely future battlegrounds of mammalian conservation, and the likely casualties. This framework could help to highlight consequences of choosing among different future climatic and socioeconomic scenarios. We end by discussing priority-setting, showing how alternative currencies for diversity can suggest very different priorities. We argue that aiming to maximize long-term evolutionary responses is inappropriate, that conservation planning needs to consider costs as well as benefits, and that proactive conservation of largely intact systems should be part of a balanced strategy.
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/56638
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences (USA)
dc.sourcePNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.subjectKeywords: biodiversity; body mass; climate change; conference paper; geographic distribution; geographic origin; mammal; nonhuman; phylogeny; priority journal; species extinction; Mammalia Extinction risk; Latent risk; Mammals
dc.titlePhylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage11563
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage11556
local.contributor.affiliationDavies, T. Jonathan, University of California
local.contributor.affiliationFritz, Susanne A., Imperial College London
local.contributor.affiliationGrenyer, Richard, Imperial College London
local.contributor.affiliationOrme, C. David L., Imperial College London
local.contributor.affiliationBielby, Jon, Imperial College London
local.contributor.affiliationBininda-Emonds, Olaf R.P., Carl von Ossietzky University
local.contributor.affiliationCardillo, Marcel, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationJones, Kate E., Zoological Society of London
local.contributor.affiliationGittleman, John L., University of Georgia
local.contributor.affiliationMace, Georgina M. , Imperial College London
local.contributor.affiliationPurvis, Andy, Imperial College London
local.contributor.authoruidCardillo, Marcel, u4578670
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor060309 - Phylogeny and Comparative Analysis
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9511635xPUB369
local.identifier.citationvolume105
local.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.0801917105
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-50049085521
local.identifier.thomsonID000258561200015
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Davies_Phylogenetic_trees_and_the_2008.pdf
Size:
1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format