Is the current public health message on UV exposure correct?

dc.contributor.authorRepacholi, Mike Hen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMcMichael, Anthonyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Robynen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-17T05:18:35Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-20T06:03:32Z
dc.date.available2009-06-17T05:18:35Zen_US
dc.date.available2010-12-20T06:03:32Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T03:46:07Z
dc.description.abstractCurrent sun safety messages stress the importance of sun protection in avoiding the consequences of excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR), such as skin cancers, cataracts and other eye diseases, and viral infections caused by UV-induced immunosuppression. However, adequate exposure to UVR has an important role in human health, primarily through UV-induced production of vitamin D, a hormone essential to bone health. Vitamin D insufficiency may be associated with increased risks of some cancers, autoimmune diseases and mental health disorders such as schizophrenia. Here, we review the evolution of current sun exposure practices and sun-safe messages and consider not only the benefits, but also the detrimental effects that such messages may have. UVR-induced vitamin D production can be inhibited by factors such as deep skin pigmentation, indoor lifestyles, older age, sun avoidance behaviours and clothing habits that limit skin exposure, with deleterious consequences for health. There is some early evidence that sun-safe messages are beginning to cause a decrease in skin cancer rates in young people. After the widespread promotion of sun safety, it may now be appropriate to refine public health messages to take better account of variations between groups and their susceptibility to the dangers and benefits of sun exposure.
dc.format7 pages
dc.identifier.citationBulletin of the World Health Organization 84.6 (2006): 485-491
dc.identifier.issn0042-9686en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10440/497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/10440/497
dc.publisherWorld Health Organization (WHO Press)
dc.sourceBulletin of the World Health Organization
dc.source.urihttp://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/84/6/485.pdfen_US
dc.subjectKeywords: vitamin D; public health; ultraviolet radiation; behavior; cataract; clothing; DNA repair; human; lifestyle; medical research; melanoma; milk; pterygium; public health service; review; skin cancer; skin pigmentation; sun exposure; sunburn; ultraviolet rad
dc.titleIs the current public health message on UV exposure correct?
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.dateAccepted2005-12-19en_US
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage491
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage485
local.contributor.affiliationLucas, Robyn, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Healthen_US
local.contributor.affiliationRepacholi, Mike H, World Health Organizationen_US
local.contributor.affiliationMcMichael, Anthony, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Healthen_US
local.contributor.authoruidu4002313en_US
local.contributor.authoruidE22866en_US
local.contributor.authoruidu4036618en_US
local.identifier.absfor111706en_US
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4054856xPUB56en_US
local.identifier.citationvolume84
local.identifier.doi10.2471/BLT.05.026559
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-33744918765
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lucas_IsTheCurrent2006.pdf
Size:
429.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format