Reply to Proença et al.: Sown biodiverse pastures are not a universal solution to invasion risk
| dc.contributor.author | Driscoll, Don A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Catford, Jane A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barney, Jacob N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hulme, Philip E | |
| dc.contributor.author | Inderjit, null | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martin, Tara G | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pauchard, Aníbal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pyšek, Petr | |
| dc.contributor.author | Richardson, David M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Riley, Sophie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Visser, Vernon | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-17T03:27:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-10-17T03:27:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-04-07 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Proença et al. (1) highlight that sown biodiverse pastures (SBP) can provide local solutions that increase production while limiting the risk of new pasture taxa invading natural areas. We agree that in Portugal SBP is an innovative approach for reducing the weed risk. However, SBP does not offer a universal solution to the problems we identify in our assessment of the risks of new pasture taxa (2). We see three issues that limit the potential of SBP as a global solution to invasion risk from pastures. | en_AU |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.citation | Don A. Driscoll, Jane A. Catford, Jacob N. Barney, Philip E. Hulme, Inderjit, Tara G. Martin, Aníbal Pauchard, Petr Pyšek, David M. Richardson, Sophie Riley, Vernon Visser (2015), Reply to Proença et al.: Sown biodiverse pastures are not a universal solution to invasion risk in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2015, 112 (14) E1696; https://dx.doi/10.1073/pnas.1500548112 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0027-8424 | en_AU |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/148430 | |
| dc.provenance | Sherpa/Romeo (Viewed 17/10/2018) Publisher's Version:restricted Subject to /Restrictions below, author can archive publisher's version/PDF General conditions: Author's pre-print on author's personal website, arXiv or bioRxiv Authors retain copyright Publisher copyright must be acknowledged Must link to publisher version Non-commercial use only Authors retain copyright Authors post-print after media embargo has expired Publisher's version/PDF may be used Publisher's version/PDF may be used on author's personal website immediately Authors may have deposit in funding body's archive or funding body's designated repository for public release 6 months after publication All PNAS-formatted versions are deposited in PubMed Central for release after 6 months, regardless of funding Applies to PNAS only Publisher last contacted on 20/02/2018 | en_AU |
| dc.source | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | en_AU |
| dc.subject | animals | en_AU |
| dc.subject | weed control | en_AU |
| dc.subject | animal husbandry | en_AU |
| dc.subject | crops, agricultural | en_AU |
| dc.subject | government regulation | en_AU |
| dc.subject | introduced species | en_AU |
| dc.subject | plant weeds | en_AU |
| dc.title | Reply to Proença et al.: Sown biodiverse pastures are not a universal solution to invasion risk | en_AU |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_AU |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | en_AU |
| local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 14 | en_AU |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | E1696 | en_AU |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | E1696 | en_AU |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia | en_AU |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 112 | en_AU |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1073/pnas.1500548112 | en_AU |
| local.identifier.essn | 1091-6490 | en_AU |
| local.type.status | Published Version | en_AU |