Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparative analysis of feature representations and machine learning methods in Android family classification

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bai, Yude
Xing, Zhenchang
Ma, Duoyuan
Li, Xiaohong
Feng, Zhiyong

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

In order to overcome the lasting increase of Android malware, malware family classification, which clusters malware with the same features into one family, has been proposed as an efficient way for malware analysis. Several machine learning based approaches have been proposed for such task of malware family classification. However, due to the adoption of very different features and learning methods in different approaches, it is still an open question to explore: which approach works better for malware family classification? In this paper, we conduct extensive experiments to answer this question. For three widely known Android malware datasets, we design five multi-classification methods for predicting Android malware family. Based on the survey of Android malware analysis literatures and the observation of a large number of Android malware, we construct a set of 250 common features shared by Android malware. And we also collect 16873 documentary features from Android Developer as a comparison. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of transfer learning for adapting the model on three malware datasets on different scales. Our empirical results show that (i) the classification methods perform very closely, with neural network model having marginally better performance (1% to 3% in F1-score), (ii) features contribute most for classification, especially to enhance API features on larger datasets, and (iii) it is model transferable across different malware datasets based on various transfer learning tasks.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Computer Networks

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31
abcd