Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?): telephone peer support to improve older patients' quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia-a multicentre prospective feasibility study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Lowthian, Judy A.
Lennox, Alyse
Curtis, Andrea J.
Wilson, Gillian
Rosewarne, Cate
Smit, De Villiers
O'Brien, Debra
Browning, Colette
Boyd, Lee
Smith, Cathie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

Abstract

Objectives To ascertain the feasibility and acceptability of the HOW R U? programme, a novel volunteer-peer postdischarge support programme for older patients after discharge from the emergency department (ED). Design A multicentre prospective mixed-methods feasibility study. Setting Two tertiary hospital EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Participants A convenience sample of 39 discharged ED patients aged 70 years or over, with symptoms of social isolation, loneliness and/or depression. Intervention The HOW R U?intervention comprised weekly social support telephone calls delivered by volunteer peers for 3 months following ED discharge. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcomes were feasibility of study processes, intervention acceptability to participants and retention in the programme. Secondary outcomes were changes in loneliness level (UCLA-3-3-item Loneliness Scale), mood (5-item Geriatric Depression Scale) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) postintervention. Results Recruitment was feasible, with 30% of eligible patients successfully recruited. Seventeen volunteer peers provided telephone support to patient participants, in addition to their usual hospital volunteer role. HOW R U?was well received, with 87% retention in the patient group, and no attrition in the volunteer group. The median age of patients was 84 years, 64% were female, and 82% lived alone. Sixty-eight per cent of patients experienced reductions in depressive symptoms, and 53% experiencing reduced feelings of loneliness, and these differences were statistically significant Patient feedback was positive and volunteers reported great satisfaction with their new role. Conclusion HOW R U? was feasible in terms of recruitment and retention and was acceptable to both patients and volunteers. The overall results support the potential for further research in this area and provide data to support the design of a definitive trial to confirm the observed effects.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Lowthian JA, Lennox A, Curtis A, et al. HOspitals and patients WoRking in Unity (HOW R U?): telephone peer support to improve older patients’ quality of life after emergency department discharge in Melbourne, Australia—a multicentre prospective feasibility study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020321. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-020321

Source

BMJ Open

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license

Restricted until

abcd