Regulating farm safety: towards an optimal policy mix

dc.contributor.authorGunningham, Neilen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2003-06-11en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T15:06:48Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:46:27Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T15:06:48Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:46:27Z
dc.date.created2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.description.abstractEach state and territory in Australia has a principal Occupational Health and Safety Act, under which farm machinery (which falls under the broad definition of “plant”) is regulated by virtue of (i) general occupational health and safety (OHS) duties on specific obligation-bearers; and (ii) specific regulations and Codes of Practice which deal with particular safety issues in more detail. In an attempt to address a lack of OHS regulatory uniformity in terms of (ii) above, the National Standard for Plant was developed and introduced in 1994. It creates a single overarching set of performance and process-based duties that require obligation-bearers to undertake hazard identification, risk analysis and risk control. The aim is to eliminate, and where that is not practicable to minimise, the risks to health and safety. Each jurisdiction also has some form of regulation (at differing stages of development and reform) regarding plant which impose legal obligations on responsible parties relevant to the life-cycle of a piece of farm machinery. In some states this essentially reproduces the provisions of the National Standard on Plant while in others it goes beyond this to impose more specific requirements. Guidance as to measures which might be taken to comply with those obligations may be found in a range of material including approved Codes of Practice (Advisory Standards in Queensland), and guidance notes by industry or regulatory bodies There are also a number of relevant Australian and international standards, the latter being particularly significant as the majority of farm machinery in Australia is imported. These other standards are voluntary and do not have legal force (other than to provide evidence of what a reasonable duty holder would do to comply with a certain legal obligation) unless adopted and prescribed in legislation/regulation. There are a number of significant problems with the current legal framework. How they might be overcome and how the regulatory regime might better contribute to improved occupational health and safety in the agricultural sector, is the subject of the remainder of the paper.en_US
dc.format.extent334048 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent360 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/41213en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41213
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.subjectregulationsen_US
dc.subjectfarm safetyen_US
dc.subjectfarm machineryen_US
dc.subjectOccupational Health and Safety Acten_US
dc.subjectnational uniformityen_US
dc.subjectenforcementen_US
dc.subjecteducation and trainingen_US
dc.subjectstandardsen_US
dc.subjectstandards designen_US
dc.titleRegulating farm safety: towards an optimal policy mixen_US
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_US
local.citationWorking Paper no.2en_US
local.contributor.affiliationNational Research Centre for OHS Regulationen_US
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_US
local.description.noteslarger report from which this paper was distilled is to be found shortly on the RIRDC internet site, under the title: Farm Machinery Safety Regulatory Review Project, <www.rirdc.gov.au>.en_US
local.description.refereednoen_US
local.identifier.citationmonthmaren_US
local.identifier.citationyear2002en_US
local.identifier.eprintid1418en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
working_paper_2.pdf
Size:
326.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format