Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Testing star formation laws in a starburst galaxy at redshift 3 resolved with ALMA

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Sharda, P.
da Cunha, Elisabete
Federrath, Christoph
Swinbank, A. M.
Dye, S.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

Using high-resolution (sub-kiloparsec scale) data obtained by ALMA, we analyse the star formation rate (SFR), gas content, and kinematics in SDP 81, a gravitationally lensed starburst galaxy at redshift 3. We estimate the SFR surface density (ΣSFR) in the brightest clump of this galaxy to be 357+135−85M⊙yr−1kpc−2, over an area of 0.07 ± 0.02 kpc2. Using the intensity-weighted velocity of CO (5–4), we measure the turbulent velocity dispersion in the plane of the sky and find σv, turb = 37 ± 5 km s−1 for the clump, in good agreement with previous estimates along the line of sight. Our measurements of the gas surface density, freefall time, and turbulent Mach number allow us to compare the theoretical SFR from various star formation models with that observed, revealing that the role of turbulence is crucial to explaining the observed SFR in this clump. While the Kennicutt–Schmidt (KS) relation predicts an SFR surface density of ΣSFR, KS = 52 ± 17 M⊙ yr−1 kpc−2, the single-freefall model by Krumholz, Dekel, and McKee (KDM) predicts ΣSFR, KDM = 106 ± 37 M⊙ yr−1 kpc−2. In contrast, the multifreefall (turbulence) model by Salim, Federrath, and Kewley (SFK) gives ΣSFR,SFK=491+139−194M⊙yr−1kpc−2. Although the SFK relation overestimates the SFR in this clump (possibly due to the negligence of magnetic fields), it provides the best prediction among the available models. Finally, we compare the star formation and gas properties of this galaxy to local star-forming regions and find that the SFK relation provides the best estimates of SFR in both local and high-redshift galaxies.

Description

Citation

Source

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until