Response to Goldstein
| dc.contributor.author | Garrett, Brian | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-10T23:30:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2015-12-10T11:09:32Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2638 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/68332 | |
| dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | |
| dc.source | Analysis | |
| dc.title | Response to Goldstein | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 4 | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 744 | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 742 | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Garrett, Brian, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU | |
| local.contributor.authoruid | Garrett, Brian, u9008400 | |
| local.description.embargo | 2037-12-31 | |
| local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
| local.identifier.absfor | 220313 - Philosophy of Language | |
| local.identifier.ariespublication | f5625xPUB1684 | |
| local.identifier.citationvolume | 72 | |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1093/analys/ans104 | |
| local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-84867413438 | |
| local.identifier.thomsonID | 000310098000017 | |
| local.type.status | Published Version |
Downloads
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 01_Garrett_Response_to_Goldstein_2012.pdf
- Size:
- 70.83 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format