Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Incremental Validity of the MMPI-2-RF Over-reporting Scales and RBS in Assessing the Veracity of Memory Complaints

dc.contributor.authorGervais, Roger O
dc.contributor.authorBen-Porath, Yossef S
dc.contributor.authorWygant, Dustin B
dc.contributor.authorSellbom, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:36:06Z
dc.description.abstractThe Response Bias Scale (RBS) has been found to be a better predictor of over-reported memory complaints than Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) F, Back Infrequency (Fb), Infrequency-Psychopathology (Fp), and FBS scales. The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (RF) validity scales were designed to meet or exceed the sensitivity of their MMPI-2 counterparts to symptom over-reporting. This study examined the incremental validity of MMPI-2-RF validity scales and RBS in assessing memory complaints. The MMPI-2-RF over-reporting validity scales were more strongly associated with mean Memory Complaints Inventory scores than their MMPI-2 counterparts (d = 0.22 to 0.49). RBS showed the strongest relationship with memory complaints. Regression analyses demonstrated the incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF Infrequent Responses, Infrequent Psychopathology Responses, Infrequent Somatic Responses, and FBS-r scales relative to MMPI-2 F, Fp, and FBS in predicting memory complaints. This is consistent with the development objectives of the MMPI-2-RF validity scales as more efficient and sensitive measures of symptom over-reporting.
dc.identifier.issn0887-6177
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/30048
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.sourceArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; anxiety disorder; article; Canada; depression; disability; expert witness; female; head injury; human; legal aspect; male; malingering; memory disorder; mental disease; middle aged; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; pain; psychological a Forensic evaluation; Malingering; Memory complaints; MMPI-2; MMPI-2-RF; Response Bias Scale
dc.titleIncremental Validity of the MMPI-2-RF Over-reporting Scales and RBS in Assessing the Veracity of Memory Complaints
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage284
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage274
local.contributor.affiliationGervais, Roger O, Neurobehavioral Associates
local.contributor.affiliationBen-Porath, Yossef S, Kent State University
local.contributor.affiliationWygant, Dustin B, Eastern Kentucky University
local.contributor.affiliationSellbom, Martin, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidSellbom, Martin, u5450539
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor170100 - PSYCHOLOGY
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5270653xPUB70
local.identifier.citationvolume25
local.identifier.doi10.1093/arclin/acq018
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-77952848672
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Gervais_Incremental_Validity_of_the_2010.pdf
Size:
169.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format