Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Development of Capability Indicators

dc.contributor.authorAnand, Paul
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Graham
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Ian
dc.contributor.authorDowding, Keith
dc.contributor.authorGuala, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorvan Hees, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:30:15Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T22:30:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T09:27:24Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper is motivated by sustained interest in the capabilities approach to welfare economics combined with the paucity of economic statistics that measure capabilities at the individual level. Specifically, it takes a much discussed account of the normatively desirable capabilities constitutive of a good life, argued to be comprehensive at a high level of abstraction, and uses it to operationalize the capabilities approach by developing a survey instrument to elicit information about capabilities at the individual level. The paper explores the extent to which these capabilities are covariates of a life satisfaction measure of utility and investigates aspects of robustness and subgroup differences using standard socio-demographic variables as well as a relatively novel control for personality. In substantial terms, we find there is some evidence of quantitative, but no qualitative, gender and age differences in the capabilities�life satisfaction relationship. Furthermore, we find that indicators from a wide range of life domains are linked to life satisfaction, a finding that supports multi-dimensional approaches to poverty and the non-materialist view that people do not just value financial income�per se. Our most important contribution, however, is primarily methodological and derives from the demonstration that, within the conventions of household and social surveys, human capabilities can be measured with the aid of suitably designed statistical indicators.
dc.identifier.issn1945-2829
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/34358
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
dc.sourceJournal of Human Development and Capabilities
dc.titleThe Development of Capability Indicators
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage152
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage125
local.contributor.affiliationAnand, Paul, The Open University
local.contributor.affiliationHunter, Graham, The Open University
local.contributor.affiliationCarter, Ian, University of Pavia
local.contributor.affiliationDowding, Keith, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGuala, Francesco, University of Exeter
local.contributor.affiliationvan Hees, Martin, University of Groningen
local.contributor.authoruidDowding, Keith, u4458840
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor160603 - Comparative Government and Politics
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4317071xPUB112
local.identifier.citationvolume10
local.identifier.doi10.1080/14649880802675366
local.identifier.thomsonID000282742400007
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads