Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Belt and Road Initiative: China's New Grand Strategy?

dc.contributor.authorClarke, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T22:54:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.date.updated2022-02-06T07:18:40Z
dc.description.abstractIn 2013, Chinese president Xi Jinping unveiled major components of what has since become known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). During an address to Nazarbayev University in the Kazakh capital, Astana, on September 7, Xi announced China's desire to "jointly build an 'economic belt' along the Silk Road" with Central Asian partners to "deepen cooperation and expand development in the Euro-Asia region."1 A month later, in an address to Indonesia's parliament, China's president encouraged Southeast Asian states to work with China to develop the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. Subsequently, China has put more "meat" on the bones of such aspirational statements through the identification of six core "economic corridors" linking the Silk Road Economic Belt and the Maritime Silk Road; the establishment of supporting multilateral financial institutions, such as the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank (AIIB) and Silk Road Fund (SRF); and the publication of an official "blueprint" by the National Development and Reform Commission for the implementation of BRI.2 Beijing has also backed the initiative with a considerable financial commitment, earmarking $40 billion for the Silk Road Economic Belt, $25 billion for the Maritime Silk Road, $50 billion for the AIIB, and $40 billion for the SRF.3
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1559-0968en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/223010
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherThe John Hopkins University Press
dc.rights© The National Bureau of Asian Research
dc.sourceAsia Policy
dc.titleThe Belt and Road Initiative: China's New Grand Strategy?
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage79en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage71en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClarke, Michael, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidClarke, Michael, u5593619en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor160799 - Social Work not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo940399 - International Relations not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4456620xPUB26en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume24en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1353/asp.2017.0023en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85027197437
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.nbr.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Clarke_The_Belt_and_Road_Initiative%3A_2017.pdf
Size:
155.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: