Review of the Amphibian Immune Response to Chytridiomycosis, and Future Directions

dc.contributor.authorGrogan, Laura F
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Lee
dc.contributor.authorSkerratt, Lee F.
dc.contributor.authorScheele, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorCastley, J Guy
dc.contributor.authorNewell, David A.
dc.contributor.authorMcCallum, Hamish
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T22:33:02Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T22:33:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2021-12-26T07:19:24Z
dc.description.abstractThe fungal skin disease, chytridiomycosis (caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. Salamandrivorans), has caused amphibian declines and extinctions globally since its emergence. Characterizing the host immune response to chytridiomycosis has been a focus of study with the aim of disease mitigation. However, many aspects of the innate and adaptive arms of this response are still poorly understood, likely due to the wide range of species' responses to infection. In this paper we provide an overview of expected immunological responses (with inference based on amphibian and mammalian immunology), together with a synthesis of current knowledge about these responses for the amphibian-chytridiomycosis system. We structure our review around four key immune stages: (1) the naïve immunocompetent state, (2) immune defenses that are always present (constitutive defenses), (3) mechanisms for recognition of a pathogen threat and innate immune defenses, and (4) adaptive immune responses. We also evaluate the current hot topics of immunosuppression and immunopathology in chytridiomycosis, and discuss their respective roles in pathogenesis. Our synthesis reveals that susceptibility to chytridiomycosis is likely to be multifactorial. Susceptible amphibians appear to have ineffective constitutive and innate defenses, and a late-stage response characterized by immunopathology and Bd-induced suppression of lymphocyte responses. Overall, we identify substantial gaps in current knowledge, particularly concerning the entire innate immune response (mechanisms of initial pathogen detection and possible immunoevasion by Bd, degree of activation and efficacy of the innate immune response, the unexpected absence of innate leukocyte infiltration, and the cause and role of late-stage immunopathology in pathogenesis). There are also gaps concerning most of the adaptive immune system (the relative importance of B and T cell responses for pathogen clearance, the capacity and extent of immunological memory, and specific mechanisms of pathogen-induced immunosuppression). Improving our capacity for amphibian immunological research will require selection of an appropriate Bd-susceptible model species, the development of taxon-specific affinity reagents and cell lines for functional assays, and the application of a suite of conventional and emerging immunological methods. Despite current knowledge gaps, immunological research remains a promising avenue for amphibian conservation management.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipJR was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID, R24-AI-059830) and from the National Science Foundation (IOS-1456213)en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1664-3224en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/286998
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_AU
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP180101415en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200240en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT100100375en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP110200240en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP120100811en_AU
dc.rights© 2018 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceFrontiers in Immunologyen_AU
dc.subjectchytridiomycosisen_AU
dc.subjectimmuneen_AU
dc.subjectinnateen_AU
dc.subjectadaptiveen_AU
dc.subjectfrogsen_AU
dc.subjectdeclinesen_AU
dc.subjectamphibianen_AU
dc.subjectBatrachochytrium dendrobatidisen_AU
dc.titleReview of the Amphibian Immune Response to Chytridiomycosis, and Future Directionsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2536en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGrogan, Laura F, Griffith Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRobert, Jacques, University of Rochesteren_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBerger, Lee, James Cook Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSkerratt, Lee F., James Cook Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationScheele, Benjamin, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCastley, J Guy, Griffith Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNewell, David A., Southern Cross Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMcCallum, Hamish, Griffith Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidScheele, Benjamin, u4408124en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor310501 - Anthropological geneticsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB2642en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume9en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.3389/fimmu.2018.02536en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85056608543
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fimmu-09-02536.pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: