Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Crozier's paradox revisited: maintenance of genetic recognition systems by disassortative mating

dc.contributor.authorHolman, Luke
dc.contributor.authorvan Zweden, Jelle S.
dc.contributor.authorLinksvayer, Timothy A.
dc.contributor.authord'Ettorre, Patrizia
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-10T23:00:51Z
dc.date.available2016-01-10T23:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-27
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T09:30:15Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Organisms are predicted to behave more favourably towards relatives, and kin-biased cooperation has been found in all domains of life from bacteria to vertebrates. Cooperation based on genetic recognition cues is paradoxical because it disproportionately benefits individuals with common phenotypes, which should erode the required cue polymorphism. Theoretical models suggest that many recognition loci likely have some secondary function that is subject to diversifying selection, keeping them variable. RESULTS: Here, we use individual-based simulations to investigate the hypothesis that the dual use of recognition cues to facilitate social behaviour and disassortative mating (e.g. for inbreeding avoidance) can maintain cue diversity over evolutionary time. Our model shows that when organisms mate disassortatively with respect to their recognition cues, cooperation and recognition locus diversity can persist at high values, especially when outcrossed matings produce more surviving offspring. Mating system affects cue diversity via at least four distinct mechanisms, and its effects interact with other parameters such as population structure. Also, the attrition of cue diversity is less rapid when cooperation does not require an exact cue match. Using a literature review, we show that there is abundant empirical evidence that heritable recognition cues are simultaneously used in social and sexual behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Our models show that mate choice is one possible resolution of the paradox of genetic kin recognition, and the literature review suggests that genetic recognition cues simultaneously inform assortative cooperation and disassortative mating in a large range of taxa. However, direct evidence is scant and there is substantial scope for future work.
dc.description.sponsorshipLH and TAL were funded by Marie Curie fellowships, JSvZ by a fellowship from the Danish Council for Independent Research, and all authors received support from the Danish National Research Foundation.en_AU
dc.identifier.citationBMC Evolutionary Biology. 2013 Sep 27;13(1):211
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/95296
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.rights© Holman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.holderHolman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.sourceBMC Evolutionary Biology
dc.subjectAltruism
dc.subjectFrequency-dependent selection
dc.subjectGreen beard
dc.subjectKin discrimination
dc.subjectSexual selection
dc.titleCrozier's paradox revisited: maintenance of genetic recognition systems by disassortative mating
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage13
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage211en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHoleman, L., Research School of Biology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu5091741en_AU
local.identifier.absfor060399 - Evolutionary Biology not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.absseo970106 - Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB6561
local.identifier.citationvolume13en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2148-13-211en_AU
local.identifier.essn1471-2148en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84884648809
local.identifier.thomsonID000325341800001
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Crozier's_Paradox_Revisited_2013.pdf
Size:
753.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: