Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The role of bodies in infants' categorical representations of humans and non-human animals

dc.contributor.authorAxelsson, Emma
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Derek
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Julia
dc.contributor.authorClifford, Brian R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T02:08:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2022-07-24T08:20:54Z
dc.description.abstractTo investigate whether bodies are useful cues in infants' category formations, 7‐month‐old infants were familiarized to images of humans or non‐human animals followed by test pairs comprising a familiar category image and a hybrid image with a novel category body. Infants familiarized to humans did not demonstrate a novelty preference for hybrid stimuli with non‐human animal bodies. Infants familiarized with non‐human animals demonstrated a novelty preference for hybrid stimuli with human bodies, suggesting that there is an asymmetry in infants' category formations of bodies. Compared with infants familiarized to non‐human animals, the infants familiarized to humans had a higher proportional fixation count to bodies during familiarization, but the lack of preference for novel category bodies at test suggests that 7‐month‐old infants' representations of the features of human bodies are likely still developing and they are more likely to form a summary‐based categorical representation of non‐human animals.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of East London's Graduate Schoolen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1522-7227en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/296955
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Incen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 The authorsen_AU
dc.sourceInfant and Child Developmenten_AU
dc.subjectbody representationsen_AU
dc.subjectcategorizationen_AU
dc.subjecteye trackingen_AU
dc.subjectfamiliarityen_AU
dc.subjectinfantsen_AU
dc.subjectsocial stimulien_AU
dc.titleThe role of bodies in infants' categorical representations of humans and non-human animalsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAxelsson, Emma, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMoore, Derek, University of East Londonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMurphy, Elizabeth, University of East Londonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGoodwin, Julia, University of East Londonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClifford, Brian R., University of East Londonen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAxelsson, Emma, u5673963en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor520101 - Child and adolescent developmenten_AU
local.identifier.absseo200401 - Behaviour and healthen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3102795xPUB377en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume27en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1002/icd.2112en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85055256450
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000451990600002
local.publisher.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TMP532184399202382912139.pdf
Size:
383.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: